CASE: IBM Workers, NY, VT and San Jose, CA v. IBM et al
CONTRACTED BY : Jones, Day, Reavis and Pogue, Washington, DC and co-defendant law firms
REPRESENTED: Defendant
Multiple plaintiffs allege health issues as result of employment in IBM semiconductor facilities and alleged resultant exposure to hazardous chemicals. ACS conducted field investigations, forensic reconstruction of historical facilities, research into relevant period standard of care and consulted with the litigation team concerning cleanroom design and industrial ventilation systems. Particular emphasis on potential exposure of workers to chemicals as a result of allegedly improper industrial ventilation and local exhaust systems. In addition, issues related to improper construction, operational practices and non-compliance with codes and ordinances were alleged, therefore these were evaluated. Preliminary report and affidavit filed. Testimony at trial in San Jose where a decision favorable to defendants was rendered.
CASE: Sintek Photronic Corporation, Taiwan, ROC v. Insurance Consortium, Taiwan, PROC
CONTRACTED BY : Sintek Photronic Corporation, Lee and Li Attorneys, Taiwan, PROC
REPRESENTED: Plaintiff
Evaluation of the improper actions of insurance consortium in the denial of payment of reasonable amount for loss related to a fire in a flat panel display manufacturing facility in Taiwan. Fire in the compressed air system of the plant damaged the facility and the production tools. Remediation efforts of insurers' contractor were inadequate. Estimated value of property damages >$40MM with business interruption loss in excess of property damages. Preparation of testing plan, supervision of analytical testing and preparation of expert report for presentation to arbitration tribunal.
CASE: AIU Insurance, et al. v. Architects & Engineers, Tokyo Japan
CONTRACTED BY: A/E Firm, Tokyo McCutchen, Brown, Doyle & Enerson (now Bingham McCutchen), San Francisco, CA
REPRESENTED: Defendant
Consulting re: cause and origin of $500MM fire and explosions in semiconductor wafer fabrication plant in Taiwan. Defendant was alleged to have provided deficient design and consulting services not in conformance with the standard of care or international building and fire codes. Field investigation and forensic reconstruction of the facility and production tools at the time of the fire (no longer in place) was conducted to determine the cause of the fire and subsequent explosions. Testing of artifacts of the fire via laboratory methods to determine trace element constituents was conducted to substantiate expert analysis and opinions. Preparation of technical report illustrating improper operation and maintenance procedures of owner. Testimony at mediation in San Francisco, CA resulted in favorable resolution for the defendant. Insurance subrogation matter.
CASE: Complex Asbestos Litigation v. Durabla, et al
CONTRACTED BY: Law Offices of Lucinda Storm - San Francisco, CA; Clemente Mueller & Tobia – Morristown, NJ
REPRESENTED: Defendant
Evaluation of claims of asbestos exposure of workers servicing refrigeration and HVAC equipment. Claims of the various plaintiffs vary from case to case and include exposure to gaskets, thermal insulation, wire insulation, etc. Consultation includes evaluation of maintenance procedures, general knowledge of refrigeration and HVAC industry practices, testing of gasket removal procedures and preparation for testimony at trial. On-going matters.
CASE: Cedars Sinai Hospital v. Contractors and Engineers
CONTRACTED BY: Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan, LLP 1620 26th Street Fourth Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060
REPRESENTED: Plaintiff
Litigation consulting and testimony at mediation involving the failure of a large absorption chilling plant to perform as required by the owner. The issues required the analysis of the design and specifications of the engineer, the proposals of the contractor and performance claims by the manufacturer that were not substantiated by field testing. Several day mediation resulted in a settlement favorable to the plaintiff owner.
CASE: Semiconductor Manufacturer, Temecula, CA
CONTRACTED BY : Clausen Miller, Newport Beach, CA
REPRESENTED: Plaintiff
Research and litigation consulting re: damages to semiconductor facility and production tools resultant from acid spill. Plaintiffs allege improper design and construction of piping, cleanroom HVAC, exhaust ventilation and control systems resulting in more than $50MM in property damages and several times that amount in business interruption losses. Preparation of preliminary report, field investigation, interviews with knowledgeable persons and research concerning standard of care and relevant codes and standards. Insurance subrogation. On-going matter.